179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
daniel
To:
Date:
Wed, 8 Jul 1998 16:36:18 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) it takes the physical....
Msg-Id:
<Pine.BSF.3.96.980708162639.14266A-100000@lestat.daniel.blkbox.com>
Mbox:
idm.9807.gz
All this talk that music must be complicated to have some artistic merit smacks of intellectual snobbery. It isn't the complicated programming <or playing for that matter> which makes a song good. It is the artistic vision and the imagination. There are many people who can play an instrument flawlessly but cannot write a song to save their life. They lack the vision; their hands can do the work but it does not matter. Then there are composers who visualize great works and use orchestras <or even samplers!> to make the sound reality. Does that make them any less an artist? Is there work now worthless? Is someone who can play an instrument <but not compose> better than this artist? If your in awe of programming ability instead of listening to the music then you should trainspot software instead. FYI: want to see the amen break twisted and distorted into something new? check out lesser: welcome to the american experience. -daniel